<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 945 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769031</link>
    <description>HC ruled that demand notices for AY 2009-10, 2011-12, and 2012-13 were illegal, as the employee cannot be held liable for employer&#039;s TDS defaults. The court quashed the notices, ordered refund of adjusted amounts totaling Rs. 2,65,080/- from AYs 2015-16 to 2019-20, and directed the Revenue to pay applicable interest. The decision affirmed that TDS liability rests with the employer, not the employee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 945 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769031</link>
      <description>HC ruled that demand notices for AY 2009-10, 2011-12, and 2012-13 were illegal, as the employee cannot be held liable for employer&#039;s TDS defaults. The court quashed the notices, ordered refund of adjusted amounts totaling Rs. 2,65,080/- from AYs 2015-16 to 2019-20, and directed the Revenue to pay applicable interest. The decision affirmed that TDS liability rests with the employer, not the employee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>