<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 954 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769040</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that duty demands based solely on estimated production using theoretical input/output ratios are legally unsustainable without considering manufacturing parameters like raw material quality, kiln conditions, and iron ore engineering properties. The tribunal ruled that clandestine manufacture and removal charges require tangible, cogent, and affirmative evidence, not mere estimations or expert opinions. Since no evidence existed of unaccounted raw material consumption, buyer acceptance of clandestinely removed goods, or transporter statements, the duty demand was set aside. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 954 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769040</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that duty demands based solely on estimated production using theoretical input/output ratios are legally unsustainable without considering manufacturing parameters like raw material quality, kiln conditions, and iron ore engineering properties. The tribunal ruled that clandestine manufacture and removal charges require tangible, cogent, and affirmative evidence, not mere estimations or expert opinions. Since no evidence existed of unaccounted raw material consumption, buyer acceptance of clandestinely removed goods, or transporter statements, the duty demand was set aside. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>