<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 991 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769077</link>
    <description>Tax Tribunal ruled on MAT computation under Section 115JB, addressing tax provision additions. The key finding was that only net tax expense (Rs. 49.20 crore) should be added to book profit, rejecting AO&#039;s approach of adding entire tax provision. The Tribunal eliminated double taxation by excluding earlier years&#039; tax adjustments and deferred tax charges. The appeal was partially allowed, directing AO to amend computation accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:38:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 991 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769077</link>
      <description>Tax Tribunal ruled on MAT computation under Section 115JB, addressing tax provision additions. The key finding was that only net tax expense (Rs. 49.20 crore) should be added to book profit, rejecting AO&#039;s approach of adding entire tax provision. The Tribunal eliminated double taxation by excluding earlier years&#039; tax adjustments and deferred tax charges. The appeal was partially allowed, directing AO to amend computation accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>