<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43021</link>
    <description>An order obtained by fraud on the court cannot be sustained: the writ petition was found to have been filed by a non-genuine claimant, supported by a false signature, substituted exhibits and other deceptive particulars, so the refund order was set aside. The court also declined to direct recovery from the respondents to the appeal because they had neither received nor benefited from the refund; recovery, if pursued, had to be directed against the person who actually obtained the money and engineered the fraud. The text states that lawful remedies remained open against the actual recipient of the refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43021</link>
      <description>An order obtained by fraud on the court cannot be sustained: the writ petition was found to have been filed by a non-genuine claimant, supported by a false signature, substituted exhibits and other deceptive particulars, so the refund order was set aside. The court also declined to direct recovery from the respondents to the appeal because they had neither received nor benefited from the refund; recovery, if pursued, had to be directed against the person who actually obtained the money and engineered the fraud. The text states that lawful remedies remained open against the actual recipient of the refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>