<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 999 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769085</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging an income tax assessment order, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust statutory appellate remedies. The Court found no prima facie breach of natural justice, as videoconferencing was offered and prior Tribunal rulings for a different assessment year do not automatically invalidate the current order. The petitioner was directed to pursue the prescribed appellate process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 999 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769085</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging an income tax assessment order, holding that the petitioner must first exhaust statutory appellate remedies. The Court found no prima facie breach of natural justice, as videoconferencing was offered and prior Tribunal rulings for a different assessment year do not automatically invalidate the current order. The petitioner was directed to pursue the prescribed appellate process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>