<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1007 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769093</link>
    <description>HC dismissed petitioner&#039;s application under Section 161 of GST Act, 2017 challenging a rectification order. The court found the application vague and lacking substantive content, validating the authority&#039;s decision to reject it without a hearing. No violation of natural justice was established since no actual rectification adversely affecting the petitioner occurred. The petition was dismissed on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 09:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1007 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769093</link>
      <description>HC dismissed petitioner&#039;s application under Section 161 of GST Act, 2017 challenging a rectification order. The court found the application vague and lacking substantive content, validating the authority&#039;s decision to reject it without a hearing. No violation of natural justice was established since no actual rectification adversely affecting the petitioner occurred. The petition was dismissed on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>