<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1453 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461629</link>
    <description>Appellate interference with an acquittal is limited to compelling and substantial reasons, and a conviction cannot be restored unless the trial court&#039;s view is perverse, manifestly erroneous, or unsupported by evidence. The accused continues to benefit from the reinforced presumption of innocence, and where two reasonable views are possible, the view favouring the accused prevails. On the facts, the relationship between the complainant and the accused was treated as consensual, the rape allegation was not supported by the proved material, and the allegations of assault, abuse, and threats were found vague and unparticularised. The acquittal was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1453 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461629</link>
      <description>Appellate interference with an acquittal is limited to compelling and substantial reasons, and a conviction cannot be restored unless the trial court&#039;s view is perverse, manifestly erroneous, or unsupported by evidence. The accused continues to benefit from the reinforced presumption of innocence, and where two reasonable views are possible, the view favouring the accused prevails. On the facts, the relationship between the complainant and the accused was treated as consensual, the rape allegation was not supported by the proved material, and the allegations of assault, abuse, and threats were found vague and unparticularised. The acquittal was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>