<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1435 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461630</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed appellant&#039;s refund claim for CVD and SAD paid after GST commencement. Tribunal held refund application filed within one-year limitation period, calculating from payment date rather than Bill of Entry date. Pay Order with Working Sheet constituted proper documentation for Cenvat Credit eligibility. Following larger bench precedent, cash refund of duties paid under erstwhile law post-GST implementation was permissible under CGST Act Section 142(3). Appeal allowed with applicable interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 20:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1435 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461630</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed appellant&#039;s refund claim for CVD and SAD paid after GST commencement. Tribunal held refund application filed within one-year limitation period, calculating from payment date rather than Bill of Entry date. Pay Order with Working Sheet constituted proper documentation for Cenvat Credit eligibility. Following larger bench precedent, cash refund of duties paid under erstwhile law post-GST implementation was permissible under CGST Act Section 142(3). Appeal allowed with applicable interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>