<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 940 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769026</link>
    <description>ITAT Patna rectified an apparent mistake in its order regarding the assessee&#039;s PAN number. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in recording the PAN details of the HUF and corrected it by replacing the incorrect PAN with the correct one. The rectification was allowed as it constituted a clear apparent mistake in the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:39:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 940 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769026</link>
      <description>ITAT Patna rectified an apparent mistake in its order regarding the assessee&#039;s PAN number. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in recording the PAN details of the HUF and corrected it by replacing the incorrect PAN with the correct one. The rectification was allowed as it constituted a clear apparent mistake in the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>