<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 119 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42990</link>
    <description>Conditional customs exemption under Notification No. 116/88-Customs required duty-free materials imported under the advance licence scheme to be used in manufacture of the resultant products and not sold, transferred, or diverted. Non-compliance with those conditions attracted Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962, because goods exempted subject to conditions become liable to confiscation when the condition is breached. The customs and import-control schemes were treated as operating together, so Customs authorities were competent to investigate compliance and proceed against breach of the notification conditions. On that basis, no writ of prohibition could restrain further action.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:03:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 119 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42990</link>
      <description>Conditional customs exemption under Notification No. 116/88-Customs required duty-free materials imported under the advance licence scheme to be used in manufacture of the resultant products and not sold, transferred, or diverted. Non-compliance with those conditions attracted Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962, because goods exempted subject to conditions become liable to confiscation when the condition is breached. The customs and import-control schemes were treated as operating together, so Customs authorities were competent to investigate compliance and proceed against breach of the notification conditions. On that basis, no writ of prohibition could restrain further action.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>