<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Clarifies Design Protection Criteria, Mandates Comprehensive Trial for Assessing Proprietary Engineering Drawings Infringement</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87497</link>
    <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision rejecting the application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC. The court established a two-pronged test for determining whether a work qualifies as a &#039;design&#039; under the Designs Act, focusing on: (i) the nature of the artistic work and its industrial application, and (ii) the functional utility of the work. The Commercial Court was directed to conduct a comprehensive trial within one year, independently assessing the infringement claims and the true nature of the Proprietary Engineering Drawings, and to decide on the interim injunction application within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Clarifies Design Protection Criteria, Mandates Comprehensive Trial for Assessing Proprietary Engineering Drawings Infringement</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87497</link>
      <description>SC upheld the HC&#039;s decision rejecting the application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC. The court established a two-pronged test for determining whether a work qualifies as a &#039;design&#039; under the Designs Act, focusing on: (i) the nature of the artistic work and its industrial application, and (ii) the functional utility of the work. The Commercial Court was directed to conduct a comprehensive trial within one year, independently assessing the infringement claims and the true nature of the Proprietary Engineering Drawings, and to decide on the interim injunction application within two months.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>