<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 878 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768964</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the contempt petition against the builder, finding no wilful disobedience of court orders. The court modified previous directives, allowing the builder to sell flats directly under NCDRC oversight. Disputes over payment demands were directed to RERA for resolution. The decision balanced the interests of both the builder and flat buyers, emphasizing regulatory mechanisms for dispute settlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 878 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768964</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the contempt petition against the builder, finding no wilful disobedience of court orders. The court modified previous directives, allowing the builder to sell flats directly under NCDRC oversight. Disputes over payment demands were directed to RERA for resolution. The decision balanced the interests of both the builder and flat buyers, emphasizing regulatory mechanisms for dispute settlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>