<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 883 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768969</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that where an assessee voluntarily pays differential duty before Show Cause Notice issuance following stock verification revealing shortages, no penalty is imposable. The appellant company paid duty and interest on detected shortages of finished goods and raw materials immediately after detection, before notice issuance. Without evidence of clandestine removal and with prompt payment demonstrating no mens rea to evade duty, penalty on both company and director was set aside. Appeal disposed off favorably.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 883 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768969</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that where an assessee voluntarily pays differential duty before Show Cause Notice issuance following stock verification revealing shortages, no penalty is imposable. The appellant company paid duty and interest on detected shortages of finished goods and raw materials immediately after detection, before notice issuance. Without evidence of clandestine removal and with prompt payment demonstrating no mens rea to evade duty, penalty on both company and director was set aside. Appeal disposed off favorably.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>