<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 886 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768972</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit on service tax paid for cargo handling services. The appellant, a coal trader, engaged a third party for cargo handling services including high sea sales transactions. The tribunal held that since the appellant paid service tax on cargo handling services received from the service provider and had direct contractual relationship, CENVAT credit was properly available. The extended limitation period was deemed inapplicable as no information was suppressed from the department. The main demand of Rs.5,10,82,374/- was set aside, while a minor demand of Rs.71,337/- was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 886 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768972</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal regarding CENVAT credit on service tax paid for cargo handling services. The appellant, a coal trader, engaged a third party for cargo handling services including high sea sales transactions. The tribunal held that since the appellant paid service tax on cargo handling services received from the service provider and had direct contractual relationship, CENVAT credit was properly available. The extended limitation period was deemed inapplicable as no information was suppressed from the department. The main demand of Rs.5,10,82,374/- was set aside, while a minor demand of Rs.71,337/- was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>