<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 888 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768974</link>
    <description>HC quashed service tax demand order due to procedural delay. The adjudication proceedings exceeded statutory timelines under Section 73(4B) of the Finance Act, 1994, by approximately nine years. Court found no justification for prolonged delay, rendering the show cause notice and subsequent order invalid, thereby providing relief to the petitioner challenging the tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 888 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768974</link>
      <description>HC quashed service tax demand order due to procedural delay. The adjudication proceedings exceeded statutory timelines under Section 73(4B) of the Finance Act, 1994, by approximately nine years. Court found no justification for prolonged delay, rendering the show cause notice and subsequent order invalid, thereby providing relief to the petitioner challenging the tax demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>