https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768975 Territorial jurisdiction to hear a writ challenging arrest and remand orders under PMLA turned on where the material events occurred and whether the alleged acts were confined to Himachal Pradesh. Because the arrest took place in New Delhi, the ECIR was registered there, and the remand and judicial custody orders were passed by the Special Court at Ghaziabad, while the alleged activity also extended to Uttar Pradesh, the dispute raised factual questions on place of commission and jurisdiction. Applying principles on offences spanning different local areas and act-consequence jurisdiction, the Himachal Pradesh High Court held that it could not entertain the challenge and that the petition was not maintainable before it. en-us Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768975 Territorial jurisdiction to hear a writ challenging arrest and remand orders under PMLA turned on where the material events occurred and whether the alleged acts were confined to Himachal Pradesh. Because the arrest took place in New Delhi, the ECIR was registered there, and the remand and judicial custody orders were passed by the Special Court at Ghaziabad, while the alleged activity also extended to Uttar Pradesh, the dispute raised factual questions on place of commission and jurisdiction. Applying principles on offences spanning different local areas and act-consequence jurisdiction, the Himachal Pradesh High Court held that it could not entertain the challenge and that the petition was not maintainable before it. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768975