<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 897 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768983</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject assessee&#039;s books of accounts as unreliable after discovering parallel accounting systems during search operations. The tribunal estimated profits at 2.21% of turnover instead of 0.47% declared by assessee, following precedent from sister concern&#039;s case with identical circumstances. The court rejected Revenue&#039;s proposal for 53% profit rate and held that estimated income should subsume original assessment disallowances to avoid double addition. Additions for unaccounted sales were limited to 2.21% profit element, while unexplained expenditure additions were deleted as they were already subsumed in the profit estimation exercise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 10:26:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 897 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768983</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reject assessee&#039;s books of accounts as unreliable after discovering parallel accounting systems during search operations. The tribunal estimated profits at 2.21% of turnover instead of 0.47% declared by assessee, following precedent from sister concern&#039;s case with identical circumstances. The court rejected Revenue&#039;s proposal for 53% profit rate and held that estimated income should subsume original assessment disallowances to avoid double addition. Additions for unaccounted sales were limited to 2.21% profit element, while unexplained expenditure additions were deleted as they were already subsumed in the profit estimation exercise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>