<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 899 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768985</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled in favor of the assessee regarding unexplained cash credit under section 68 for share application money received. The assessee provided comprehensive documentation including PAN, share applications, board resolutions, confirmations, financial statements, and bank statements proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The AO ignored this evidence and relied solely on third-party statements recorded during search operations. The tribunal noted that the statement maker had retracted his statement, and following Rajasthan HC precedent, held that additions cannot be made based on retracted statements alone. The appeal was decided against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:40:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 899 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768985</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled in favor of the assessee regarding unexplained cash credit under section 68 for share application money received. The assessee provided comprehensive documentation including PAN, share applications, board resolutions, confirmations, financial statements, and bank statements proving identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. The AO ignored this evidence and relied solely on third-party statements recorded during search operations. The tribunal noted that the statement maker had retracted his statement, and following Rajasthan HC precedent, held that additions cannot be made based on retracted statements alone. The appeal was decided against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>