<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768993</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition under section 41(1) for sundry creditors. The tribunal admitted additional evidence that was not previously considered by lower authorities. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after proper examination and verification of the evidence submitted by the assessee. The impugned order was set aside and grounds raised by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815156" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 907 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768993</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding addition under section 41(1) for sundry creditors. The tribunal admitted additional evidence that was not previously considered by lower authorities. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after proper examination and verification of the evidence submitted by the assessee. The impugned order was set aside and grounds raised by the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>