<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 925 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769011</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax assessment order. The Court held that alternate statutory remedies must be exhausted before seeking extraordinary writ jurisdiction. The petitioner failed to demonstrate the inefficacy of available appeal mechanisms. Challenges to assessment order&#039;s merits, limitation periods, and alleged procedural irregularities were deemed appropriate for resolution through standard appellate processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:37:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 925 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769011</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging a tax assessment order. The Court held that alternate statutory remedies must be exhausted before seeking extraordinary writ jurisdiction. The petitioner failed to demonstrate the inefficacy of available appeal mechanisms. Challenges to assessment order&#039;s merits, limitation periods, and alleged procedural irregularities were deemed appropriate for resolution through standard appellate processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>