https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42984 A discharge based on the view that bleaching, dyeing, sizing, printing and finishing of grey fabric did not amount to manufacture could not survive after the Supreme Court held that such processes produce a commercially different commodity and fall within manufacture under the excise law. Once that binding interpretation applied, the legal foundation of the discharge order disappeared. The discharge was therefore unsustainable and had to be set aside, with the matter restored for further proceedings in accordance with law. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:58:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42984 A discharge based on the view that bleaching, dyeing, sizing, printing and finishing of grey fabric did not amount to manufacture could not survive after the Supreme Court held that such processes produce a commercially different commodity and fall within manufacture under the excise law. Once that binding interpretation applied, the legal foundation of the discharge order disappeared. The discharge was therefore unsustainable and had to be set aside, with the matter restored for further proceedings in accordance with law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 10 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42984