<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 875 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed tax assessment issues involving double taxation of recovered bad debts. The key ruling set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, recognizing a rectification order that corrected an erroneous income addition of Rs. 52,16,56,993/-. The SC held that taxing the same income twice is impermissible, and subsequent section 154 rectification order effectively resolved the taxation mistake, thereby preventing double taxation of the same income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 08:35:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 875 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed tax assessment issues involving double taxation of recovered bad debts. The key ruling set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order, recognizing a rectification order that corrected an erroneous income addition of Rs. 52,16,56,993/-. The SC held that taxing the same income twice is impermissible, and subsequent section 154 rectification order effectively resolved the taxation mistake, thereby preventing double taxation of the same income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>