<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Demand confirmed under section 73(1)of finance act 1994</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119879</link>
    <description>Wrongly confirming a demand under Section 73(1) instead of Section 73(2) is not, without more, a valid ground to set aside the original order where no prejudice or denial of hearing occurred; such referencing errors are curable by rectification under Section 74, or may be addressed by appeal on substantive grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 03:48:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:40:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Demand confirmed under section 73(1)of finance act 1994</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119879</link>
      <description>Wrongly confirming a demand under Section 73(1) instead of Section 73(2) is not, without more, a valid ground to set aside the original order where no prejudice or denial of hearing occurred; such referencing errors are curable by rectification under Section 74, or may be addressed by appeal on substantive grounds.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 03:48:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>