https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42982 A pending appeal does not suspend an adjudicated order unless it is stayed, so the refund direction remained operative and enforceable. The existence of an alternative remedy under Rule 41 did not bar writ relief where the binding tribunal decision was not being implemented. The objection of unjust enrichment also failed because the competent tribunal had already ruled on the legality of the claim. The respondents were directed to grant the refund with interest and costs. en-us Fri, 19 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:53:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42982 A pending appeal does not suspend an adjudicated order unless it is stayed, so the refund direction remained operative and enforceable. The existence of an alternative remedy under Rule 41 did not bar writ relief where the binding tribunal decision was not being implemented. The objection of unjust enrichment also failed because the competent tribunal had already ruled on the legality of the claim. The respondents were directed to grant the refund with interest and costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42982