https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461608 Calcutta HC upheld its territorial jurisdiction as part of the contractual chain occurred within its jurisdiction, despite the main contract being executed outside. The court held that a sub-contractor has locus standi to compel payment from the primary contracting party to the intermediate contractor. The appellant had approved sub-contracting by conduct and was estopped from denying it. Following contract termination, HC directed appellant to pay the intermediate contractor within two months, who must then pay the sub-contractor within one month. Appeal dismissed. en-us Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:54:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461608 Calcutta HC upheld its territorial jurisdiction as part of the contractual chain occurred within its jurisdiction, despite the main contract being executed outside. The court held that a sub-contractor has locus standi to compel payment from the primary contracting party to the intermediate contractor. The appellant had approved sub-contracting by conduct and was estopped from denying it. Following contract termination, HC directed appellant to pay the intermediate contractor within two months, who must then pay the sub-contractor within one month. Appeal dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461608