<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2367 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461612</link>
    <description>Finacle software developed and customised for banks was examined for classification as Information Technology Software under heading 8523 8020 and its liability to excise duty. The text records that CESTAT remanded the issue to the adjudicating authority for requantification of the demand, and the Supreme Court issued notice confined to the question of interim relief. No final adjudication on classification or duty liability is stated in the supplied text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2367 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461612</link>
      <description>Finacle software developed and customised for banks was examined for classification as Information Technology Software under heading 8523 8020 and its liability to excise duty. The text records that CESTAT remanded the issue to the adjudicating authority for requantification of the demand, and the Supreme Court issued notice confined to the question of interim relief. No final adjudication on classification or duty liability is stated in the supplied text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>