<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1412 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461616</link>
    <description>The HC upheld disallowance of tax deduction for delayed payment of employees&#039; PF and ESI contributions under Section 36(1)(va). The court rejected the assessee&#039;s arguments for deduction under alternative provisions, affirming that statutory contributions must be deposited within prescribed due dates. The disallowance through Section 143(1)(a)(iv) adjustment was deemed valid, with the AO directed to verify actual payment dates for potential deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1412 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461616</link>
      <description>The HC upheld disallowance of tax deduction for delayed payment of employees&#039; PF and ESI contributions under Section 36(1)(va). The court rejected the assessee&#039;s arguments for deduction under alternative provisions, affirming that statutory contributions must be deposited within prescribed due dates. The disallowance through Section 143(1)(a)(iv) adjustment was deemed valid, with the AO directed to verify actual payment dates for potential deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>