<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1634 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461618</link>
    <description>The SC&#039;s ruling in a tax dispute involving PF/ESIC contributions affirmed disallowance of deductions for late payments. The Tribunal upheld precedent from Checkmate Services, ruling that contributions paid after statutory due dates but before tax return filing are not eligible for deductions under Section 36(i)(va). The case was remanded to the AO for re-evaluation of the disallowance, with instructions to verify actual salary disbursement dates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 20:54:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=815089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1634 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461618</link>
      <description>The SC&#039;s ruling in a tax dispute involving PF/ESIC contributions affirmed disallowance of deductions for late payments. The Tribunal upheld precedent from Checkmate Services, ruling that contributions paid after statutory due dates but before tax return filing are not eligible for deductions under Section 36(i)(va). The case was remanded to the AO for re-evaluation of the disallowance, with instructions to verify actual salary disbursement dates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>