<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (8) TMI 160 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42977</link>
    <description>In quasi-judicial excise adjudication, where no specific procedure governs witness examination, the authority may regulate cross-examination in a fair manner consistent with natural justice. The presence of investigating officers during examination is not inherently illegal; exclusion is justified only on material showing a real likelihood of intimidation, coercion, or influence, and no such material was shown here. The authority also has discretion over the sequence of cross-examination and need not accept an inflexible order preferred by a party, especially where that would delay completion of the enquiry. Limited fairness safeguards may still be preserved by recalling witnesses if later evidence requires it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:40:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (8) TMI 160 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42977</link>
      <description>In quasi-judicial excise adjudication, where no specific procedure governs witness examination, the authority may regulate cross-examination in a fair manner consistent with natural justice. The presence of investigating officers during examination is not inherently illegal; exclusion is justified only on material showing a real likelihood of intimidation, coercion, or influence, and no such material was shown here. The authority also has discretion over the sequence of cross-examination and need not accept an inflexible order preferred by a party, especially where that would delay completion of the enquiry. Limited fairness safeguards may still be preserved by recalling witnesses if later evidence requires it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>