<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unsecured Loans and Share Capital Challenged: Insufficient Evidence Leads to Tax Liability Confirmation Under Section 68</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87483</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding unsecured loans and share capital. Despite the Assessee&#039;s claims of secured loans from banks and share applicant companies&#039; replies, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to substantiate the genuineness of transactions. The share applicant companies&#039; stereotypical responses and failure to appear before the Assessing Officer, coupled with the Assessee&#039;s inability to discharge the burden of proof under Section 68, led to the confirmation of the original addition. The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, finding no merit in the grounds presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unsecured Loans and Share Capital Challenged: Insufficient Evidence Leads to Tax Liability Confirmation Under Section 68</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87483</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act regarding unsecured loans and share capital. Despite the Assessee&#039;s claims of secured loans from banks and share applicant companies&#039; replies, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to substantiate the genuineness of transactions. The share applicant companies&#039; stereotypical responses and failure to appear before the Assessing Officer, coupled with the Assessee&#039;s inability to discharge the burden of proof under Section 68, led to the confirmation of the original addition. The Tribunal dismissed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, finding no merit in the grounds presented.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>