<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 816 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768902</link>
    <description>A composite contract involving both supply of goods and services was treated as taxable only under Works Contract Service from 01.06.2007, so service tax could not be sustained under Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service for that contract. On that legal basis, the demand under the wrong taxable category was held unsustainable and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 816 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768902</link>
      <description>A composite contract involving both supply of goods and services was treated as taxable only under Works Contract Service from 01.06.2007, so service tax could not be sustained under Erection, Commissioning or Installation Service for that contract. On that legal basis, the demand under the wrong taxable category was held unsustainable and the assessee obtained consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>