<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 822 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768908</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appellant builder/developer was not liable to pay Service Tax under &#039;Construction of Residential Complexes&#039; category for period June 2005 to January 2007. Despite constructing and selling 1092 flats in &#039;Ittina Neela&#039; project through individual agreements with buyers, Board Circulars clarified that builders are not liable for Service Tax prior to 01.07.2010. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 822 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768908</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appellant builder/developer was not liable to pay Service Tax under &#039;Construction of Residential Complexes&#039; category for period June 2005 to January 2007. Despite constructing and selling 1092 flats in &#039;Ittina Neela&#039; project through individual agreements with buyers, Board Circulars clarified that builders are not liable for Service Tax prior to 01.07.2010. Appeal allowed, impugned order set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>