<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 826 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768912</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal dismissed an appeal by a company under liquidation, applying IBC Section 31 and CESTAT Rule 22. After the completion of liquidation proceedings, the court held that claims not included in the resolution plan are extinguished. With no continuation application filed by the successor-in-interest, the appeal was deemed infructuous and abated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 826 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768912</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal dismissed an appeal by a company under liquidation, applying IBC Section 31 and CESTAT Rule 22. After the completion of liquidation proceedings, the court held that claims not included in the resolution plan are extinguished. With no continuation application filed by the successor-in-interest, the appeal was deemed infructuous and abated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>