https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768913 CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant regarding classification of imported projectors. The Tribunal held that projectors should be classified under CTH 8528 6100 as data projectors solely and principally used with Automatic Data Processing machines, rather than under CTH 8528 6900. The decision relied on established precedent from the appellant's own case and numerous other settled cases supporting this classification. The appellant was entitled to the benefit of exemption under the correct classification. Appeal was allowed. en-us Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768913 CESTAT Bangalore ruled in favor of the appellant regarding classification of imported projectors. The Tribunal held that projectors should be classified under CTH 8528 6100 as data projectors solely and principally used with Automatic Data Processing machines, rather than under CTH 8528 6900. The decision relied on established precedent from the appellant's own case and numerous other settled cases supporting this classification. The appellant was entitled to the benefit of exemption under the correct classification. Appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768913