<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 832 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768918</link>
    <description>Tribunal addressed a customs classification dispute involving L-Glutamine with berries. The key issue was the product&#039;s tariff classification, with the Department proposing CTH 2106 9099 and the appellant arguing for CTH 2922 4990. The Tribunal criticized reliance on Wikipedia for legal determinations, remanded the case for reconsideration, and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to reassess classification based on comprehensive evidence within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 832 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768918</link>
      <description>Tribunal addressed a customs classification dispute involving L-Glutamine with berries. The key issue was the product&#039;s tariff classification, with the Department proposing CTH 2106 9099 and the appellant arguing for CTH 2922 4990. The Tribunal criticized reliance on Wikipedia for legal determinations, remanded the case for reconsideration, and directed the Commissioner (Appeals) to reassess classification based on comprehensive evidence within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>