<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 843 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768929</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act due to incorrect factual findings by the Assessing Officer. The sanction under Section 151 was deemed invalid because the Principal Commissioner&#039;s approval form lacked a date. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings, emphasizing the importance of procedural accuracy and factual correctness in tax litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 08:38:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 843 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768929</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act due to incorrect factual findings by the Assessing Officer. The sanction under Section 151 was deemed invalid because the Principal Commissioner&#039;s approval form lacked a date. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings, emphasizing the importance of procedural accuracy and factual correctness in tax litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>