<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 138 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42940</link>
    <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras directed the petitioner in a writ petition against the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 within three weeks for the appeal hearing, despite an imposed duty of Rs. 2,67,577.90. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:45:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 138 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42940</link>
      <description>The High Court of Judicature at Madras directed the petitioner in a writ petition against the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) to deposit Rs. 1,00,000 within three weeks for the appeal hearing, despite an imposed duty of Rs. 2,67,577.90. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>