<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1350 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461600</link>
    <description>Where the revenue owed refundable tax to the assessee and the assessee sought to set it off against liability under an amnesty scheme, a procedural objection to the online adjustment mechanism could not defeat substantive relief when the objection was untenable. The High Court upheld the adjustment of the refund toward the amnesty liability and rejected the State&#039;s challenge to that relief, leaving the direction in favour of the assessee intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 19:01:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1350 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461600</link>
      <description>Where the revenue owed refundable tax to the assessee and the assessee sought to set it off against liability under an amnesty scheme, a procedural objection to the online adjustment mechanism could not defeat substantive relief when the objection was untenable. The High Court upheld the adjustment of the refund toward the amnesty liability and rejected the State&#039;s challenge to that relief, leaving the direction in favour of the assessee intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>