<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42934</link>
    <description>The High Court held that excise duty should be assessed based on the actual assessable value of manufactured goods, not solely on conversion charges. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, the Court emphasized including raw material costs, job work, manufacturing profit, and expenses in the assessment while excluding post-manufacturing profits. The Assistant Collector&#039;s decision to consider the selling price of another company was deemed incorrect. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order, and directed a reassessment based on the actual value of the petitioner&#039;s manufactured cigarettes for excise duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 155 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42934</link>
      <description>The High Court held that excise duty should be assessed based on the actual assessable value of manufactured goods, not solely on conversion charges. Relying on the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent, the Court emphasized including raw material costs, job work, manufacturing profit, and expenses in the assessment while excluding post-manufacturing profits. The Assistant Collector&#039;s decision to consider the selling price of another company was deemed incorrect. The Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order, and directed a reassessment based on the actual value of the petitioner&#039;s manufactured cigarettes for excise duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>