https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42925 The court upheld the principle of promissory estoppel against the government, directing the refund of any excess duty collected from the petitioner and ensuring the petitioner received the benefits promised under the earlier notification. The court found that the doctrine of promissory estoppel applied as the government had made a clear promise through a notification, and the petitioner had relied on it. The court allowed the petition, ordering the refund to be processed by a specified date with no costs awarded. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:50:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42925 The court upheld the principle of promissory estoppel against the government, directing the refund of any excess duty collected from the petitioner and ensuring the petitioner received the benefits promised under the earlier notification. The court found that the doctrine of promissory estoppel applied as the government had made a clear promise through a notification, and the petitioner had relied on it. The court allowed the petition, ordering the refund to be processed by a specified date with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 12 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42925