<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Software Reimbursement Not Taxable: ITAT Clarifies Technical Services Scope, Rejects Tax Addition for SAP Installation Charges</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87458</link>
    <description>ITAT held that reimbursements for SAP software installation, intranet, and maintenance charges are not taxable in India as &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-verify design and drawing details, placing the burden of proof on the assessee. Regarding interest chargeability for non-residents, the tribunal referenced precedent establishing that section 209(1) proviso has prospective effect only. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the disputed tax addition and accepted the assessee&#039;s grounds, maintaining judicial consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions from assessment year 1992-93 onwards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Software Reimbursement Not Taxable: ITAT Clarifies Technical Services Scope, Rejects Tax Addition for SAP Installation Charges</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87458</link>
      <description>ITAT held that reimbursements for SAP software installation, intranet, and maintenance charges are not taxable in India as &#039;Fees for Technical Services&#039; under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-verify design and drawing details, placing the burden of proof on the assessee. Regarding interest chargeability for non-residents, the tribunal referenced precedent establishing that section 209(1) proviso has prospective effect only. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the disputed tax addition and accepted the assessee&#039;s grounds, maintaining judicial consistency with prior coordinate bench decisions from assessment year 1992-93 onwards.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>