<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Shell Company Claims Dismissed: Lack of Evidence Clears RK Emporium&#039;s Transactions Under Section 2(9)(A) of PBPTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87450</link>
    <description>AT determined that M/s RK Emporium is not a shell company, and the absence of Benamidars does not create a presumption of impropriety. Despite suspicious circumstances like bank credits during demonetization, the investigation failed to establish evidence of a benami transaction under Section 2(9)(A) of PBPTA. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, lifted the provisional attachment of Rs. 1.12 crore from the appellant&#039;s bank account, and allowed the appeal, finding insufficient proof to substantiate claims of a benami property transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Shell Company Claims Dismissed: Lack of Evidence Clears RK Emporium&#039;s Transactions Under Section 2(9)(A) of PBPTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87450</link>
      <description>AT determined that M/s RK Emporium is not a shell company, and the absence of Benamidars does not create a presumption of impropriety. Despite suspicious circumstances like bank credits during demonetization, the investigation failed to establish evidence of a benami transaction under Section 2(9)(A) of PBPTA. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned order, lifted the provisional attachment of Rs. 1.12 crore from the appellant&#039;s bank account, and allowed the appeal, finding insufficient proof to substantiate claims of a benami property transaction.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>