https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768835 In quashing proceedings, the Court will not assess evidence as at trial, and alleged insufficiency of material against the first accused was not enough to justify interference where prosecution statements and surrounding circumstances prima facie supported the charge. The final report and further proceedings against the first accused were therefore sustained. By contrast, the eighth accused was linked only through his car being used to carry the alleged bribe money, and no material showed his knowledge of that use or participation in the conspiracy. In the absence of such material, continuation of the prosecution against him was unwarranted, and the proceedings were quashed. en-us Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768835 In quashing proceedings, the Court will not assess evidence as at trial, and alleged insufficiency of material against the first accused was not enough to justify interference where prosecution statements and surrounding circumstances prima facie supported the charge. The final report and further proceedings against the first accused were therefore sustained. By contrast, the eighth accused was linked only through his car being used to carry the alleged bribe money, and no material showed his knowledge of that use or participation in the conspiracy. In the absence of such material, continuation of the prosecution against him was unwarranted, and the proceedings were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768835