<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 765 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768851</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal of a construction sub-contractor challenging service tax demand. The tribunal held that construction services provided to Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB), a 100% government subsidiary, for power station infrastructure and employee residences were non-commercial in nature and exempt from service tax under relevant circulars. The revenue&#039;s demand was based on improper classification combining different services without calculating individual taxable values. The tribunal found the services were part of government infrastructure projects and therefore not liable to service tax, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 765 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768851</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal of a construction sub-contractor challenging service tax demand. The tribunal held that construction services provided to Bihar State Electricity Board (BSEB), a 100% government subsidiary, for power station infrastructure and employee residences were non-commercial in nature and exempt from service tax under relevant circulars. The revenue&#039;s demand was based on improper classification combining different services without calculating individual taxable values. The tribunal found the services were part of government infrastructure projects and therefore not liable to service tax, setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>