https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768891 Where a prior judicial direction required the competent authority to reconsider the matter after hearing the affected party and to pass a reasoned order, recovery action taken without such compliance was unsustainable. The High Court held that the impugned office memoranda and recovery proceedings could not stand because no fresh speaking order had been passed after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The memoranda and recoveries were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:23:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768891 Where a prior judicial direction required the competent authority to reconsider the matter after hearing the affected party and to pass a reasoned order, recovery action taken without such compliance was unsustainable. The High Court held that the impugned office memoranda and recovery proceedings could not stand because no fresh speaking order had been passed after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The memoranda and recoveries were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768891