https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768892 The conditional interim stay requiring deposit of 10% of the disputed tax was modified because the dispute arose from a mistaken claim of input tax credit in IGST instead of CGST and WBGST, and the matter was treated as revenue neutral with no loss to the State. On those facts, the deposit condition was found unnecessary, and the impugned orders in the writ petition were stayed without any condition. The appellants were accordingly exempted from depositing the disputed amount, and the stay was continued until disposal of the writ petition. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768892 The conditional interim stay requiring deposit of 10% of the disputed tax was modified because the dispute arose from a mistaken claim of input tax credit in IGST instead of CGST and WBGST, and the matter was treated as revenue neutral with no loss to the State. On those facts, the deposit condition was found unnecessary, and the impugned orders in the writ petition were stayed without any condition. The appellants were accordingly exempted from depositing the disputed amount, and the stay was continued until disposal of the writ petition. Case-Laws GST Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768892