https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768892 HC held that, in view of the peculiar facts, the impugned orders relating to alleged wrongful ITC claim warranted unconditional interim protection. The appellant/writ petitioners contended that ITC was mistakenly claimed under IGST instead of being correctly apportioned between CGST and WBGST, causing a higher ITC figure to be reflected in the IGST electronic credit ledger. Considering this, HC ordered that the impugned orders shall remain stayed until final disposal of the writ petition. The petitioners were exempted from depositing 10% of the disputed tax as directed by the writ court. The petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2025 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768892 HC held that, in view of the peculiar facts, the impugned orders relating to alleged wrongful ITC claim warranted unconditional interim protection. The appellant/writ petitioners contended that ITC was mistakenly claimed under IGST instead of being correctly apportioned between CGST and WBGST, causing a higher ITC figure to be reflected in the IGST electronic credit ledger. Considering this, HC ordered that the impugned orders shall remain stayed until final disposal of the writ petition. The petitioners were exempted from depositing 10% of the disputed tax as directed by the writ court. The petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws GST Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768892