https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768895 HC considered a petition challenging GST liability on a revenue-sharing arrangement under a development agreement between petitioner and a realty LLP. Petitioner contended there was no transfer, and even if any transfer existed, it was of immovable property, outside GST's scope. HC accepted that a prima facie case for interim relief was made out and effectively stayed the demand, directing respondent authorities to file an affidavit in reply within two weeks and serve it on petitioner's advocate. The petition was accordingly disposed of. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768895 HC considered a petition challenging GST liability on a revenue-sharing arrangement under a development agreement between petitioner and a realty LLP. Petitioner contended there was no transfer, and even if any transfer existed, it was of immovable property, outside GST's scope. HC accepted that a prima facie case for interim relief was made out and effectively stayed the demand, directing respondent authorities to file an affidavit in reply within two weeks and serve it on petitioner's advocate. The petition was accordingly disposed of. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768895