<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 810 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768896</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed a petition challenging the mandatory requirement of complete e-way bills for goods transportation. The court held that post-2018 amendments to UP GST Rules made it obligatory for goods to be accompanied by complete e-way bills during transit. The petitioner&#039;s goods were intercepted with only Part A of the e-way bill completed, while Part B was generated an hour after interception. Additionally, the e-way bill showed transportation from Agra to Agra while goods were actually moved from Agra to Noida. The court found this conduct demonstrated intention to evade tax, establishing a rebuttable presumption of tax evasion when goods lack proper e-way bill documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2025 08:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=814353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 810 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768896</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC dismissed a petition challenging the mandatory requirement of complete e-way bills for goods transportation. The court held that post-2018 amendments to UP GST Rules made it obligatory for goods to be accompanied by complete e-way bills during transit. The petitioner&#039;s goods were intercepted with only Part A of the e-way bill completed, while Part B was generated an hour after interception. Additionally, the e-way bill showed transportation from Agra to Agra while goods were actually moved from Agra to Noida. The court found this conduct demonstrated intention to evade tax, establishing a rebuttable presumption of tax evasion when goods lack proper e-way bill documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=768896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>