<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (3) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42886</link>
    <description>Almonds imported under a REP licence were held not to fall within a licence permitting seeds, bulbs, mother plant, germ plasm and related items, because tariff classification treated almonds as goods under Chapter 8 and Chapter 12 expressly excluded items falling under heading 08.02. The customs enquiry was valid: authorities could examine whether the imported goods matched the licence description without intruding into the Licensing Authority&#039;s function. Commercial and botanical descriptions could not override the clear tariff classification or the import documents describing the goods as almonds in-shell. The result was that the import was treated as outside the licence coverage, and confiscation and penalty were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (3) TMI 86 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42886</link>
      <description>Almonds imported under a REP licence were held not to fall within a licence permitting seeds, bulbs, mother plant, germ plasm and related items, because tariff classification treated almonds as goods under Chapter 8 and Chapter 12 expressly excluded items falling under heading 08.02. The customs enquiry was valid: authorities could examine whether the imported goods matched the licence description without intruding into the Licensing Authority&#039;s function. Commercial and botanical descriptions could not override the clear tariff classification or the import documents describing the goods as almonds in-shell. The result was that the import was treated as outside the licence coverage, and confiscation and penalty were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>