https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42883 The High Court upheld the conviction and sentence for accused Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, sentencing them to four months of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. Accused No. 3 was acquitted due to lack of proof of conscious possession of the smuggled goods. The court recognized the delay in judicial proceedings but upheld the reduced sentence, granting time for surrender until a specified date in 1990. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:11:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42883 The High Court upheld the conviction and sentence for accused Nos. 1 and 2 under Section 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, sentencing them to four months of rigorous imprisonment and a fine. Accused No. 3 was acquitted due to lack of proof of conscious possession of the smuggled goods. The court recognized the delay in judicial proceedings but upheld the reduced sentence, granting time for surrender until a specified date in 1990. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=42883